|
ASA Supports U.S. Rejection
of Flawed WTO Pact
"Proposal Would Have Been a ‘Lose-Lose’ Deal for U.S. Soybean
Farmers"
July 30, 2008… Saint Louis, Missouri… The American Soybean
Association (ASA) supports U.S. negotiators in
Geneva for rejecting proposals in the Doha trade negotiations that did
not provide sufficient market access for U.S. producers.
The latest proposal would have sharply reduced U.S. domestic support
programs, while allowing developing countries to increase tariffs on key
agricultural products above their current levels.
"ASA is proud of our negotiating team, led by U.S. Trade
Representative Ambassador Susan Schwab, in walking away from a bad deal
in Geneva," said ASA President John Hoffman, a soybean producer from
Waterloo, Iowa. "We had consistently stated that U.S. soybean producers
would take a significant reduction in domestic farm programs if we got
an equally significant increase in market access, particularly to
developing countries.
"The Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) proposal insisted on by India
and other countries could have created a huge loophole for developing
countries to shield their domestic markets, even when price and import
conditions are relatively normal," Hoffman said. "Added to the nearly 70
percent cut in U.S. trade-distorting support programs the Administration
was offering, this proposal would have been a ‘lose-lose’ deal for U.S.
soybean farmers."
Hoffman’s comments followed the announcement that talks on the World
Trade Organization (WTO) agreement in the so-called "mini-Ministerial"
meeting in Geneva had collapsed this week after developing countries,
led by India, insisted that they not only be allowed to use a SSM to
unduly restrict imports, but also be allowed to raise tariffs by up to
25 percent above current levels. U.S.
negotiators said that raising tariff rates higher than currently
permitted under the Uruguay Round agreement would set efforts to
liberalize world trade back by 30 years.
"Allowing major U.S. customers like India and China to not only avoid
tariff reductions on soybean and livestock products, but to actually
increase them when imports increase or prices fall, would have undercut
all efforts to liberalize trade in these negotiations," Hoffman said.
Hoffman added that "the negotiating text on the table also did not
discipline the Differential Export Taxes (DETs) that Argentina and other
countries use to unfairly subsidize exports of soybean and other oilseed
products. ASA has insisted that DETs be eliminated as part of any
acceptable agreement."
Hoffman concluded, "ASA continues to support the WTO framework as the
only effective means for expanding world trade, including access to
foreign markets for U.S. soybean and livestock product exports. We will
continue to work with the current Administration and its successor to
ensure that any new WTO agreement is fair and beneficial to American
soybean farmers."
ASA is the policy advocate and collective voice of its 22,000
producer-members on domestic and international issues of importance to
all U.S. soybean farmers.
--30--
For more information contact:
John Hoffman, ASA President, (319) 233-9480, jhoffman@neotek.net
Bill Schuermann, ASA Executive Director, Member & Industry Relations,
(314) 576-1770, bschuermann@soy.org
Access this release at: www.soygrowers.com/newsroom/news.htm |