|
ASA Welcomes APHIS Scientific Review of Risks of
Soybean Rust, But Key Knowledge Gaps Remain
February 27, 2004... Saint Louis, Missouri... The
American Soybean Association (ASA) welcomes a scientific review
published February 23 by the United States Department of Agriculture’s
(USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). The document
titled, "Status of Scientific Evidence on Risks Associated with the
Introduction into the Continental United States of Phakopsora
pachyrhizi With Imported
Soybean Grain, Seed and Meal," provides a concise summary of
current data while identifying significant knowledge gaps about the
risk of accidental introduction of Asian soybean rust disease into the
United States as a result of soy imports from rust infected countries.
"APHIS’ scientific review is useful in
examining the state of existing knowledge about soybean rust, and it
clearly demonstrates the need for additional information in several key
areas to determine whether commodity soybeans can be imported safely
from rust-infected countries," said ASA Chairman Dwain Ford, a
soybean producer from Kinmundy, Illinois. "ASA believes these
questions need to be answered, based on the best-available science,
before a Pest Risk Analysis for soybeans and procedures governing
imports of commodity soybeans from rust-infected countries are issued by
USDA."
Since rust spores can survive for extended but yet
unknown periods of time in vegetative material or on the surface of
soybeans, the period of time rust spores remain viable in light,
humidity, and other conditions in which soybeans typically are stored in
rust-infected countries is one of the key questions that must be
answered. Previous studies have indicated that rust spores can remain
viable for 45 days or more. ASA understands that scientists of USDA’s
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) will soon be conducting experiments
to answer this important question, and ASA has previously submitted to
APHIS a series of questions probing this particular issue. ASA also has
questions about the potential for re-contamination during the various
transfer and loading stages.
While questions remain unanswered about whether
soybeans can be imported safely from rust-infected countries, APHIS’
scientific review documents that rust spores are destroyed by the heat
and other processes used to convert whole soybeans into soybean meal and
soybean oil. ASA believes that any final Pest Risk Analysis or import
protocols governing soybean meal imports from rust-infected countries
must require that any foreign material intended to be added back into
soymeal undergo heat treatment to destroy any rust spores that might be
present. ASA also believes that finished soybean meal must be handled in
such a manner as to prevent contamination with viable rust spores.
With regard to planting seed, APHIS’ scientific
review documents that soybean rust is not a disease that infects the
seed or seed coat, but rather is present in vegetative material or
potentially on the outer surface of seeds. For this reason, ASA believes
that import protocols governing soybean planting seed imports should
require that the seed be clean and free of vegetative material. APHIS’
scientific review states that soybean seed is treated with a fungicide
as a normal commercial practice. ASA therefore believes that APHIS
should require the fungicide treatment of seed from rust-infected
countries.
Soybean rust (P. pachyrhizi) is
listed as a select biological agent that is under official control to
prevent its introduction
into the continental U.S., and is
therefore considered a quarantine pest subject to phytosanitary
measures. APHIS acknowledges that an updated, national, comprehensive
economic analysis of a major U.S. infestation of soybean rust will
require a much more involved analysis than was presented in the February
23 report.
"ASA continues to examine the scientific review
in detail," Ford said. "ASA’s goal is to protect the U.S.
soybean industry from the accidental introduction of soybean rust via
imports, while ensuring that decisions are based on science. Decisions
or import restrictions that aren’t science-based could come back to
hurt us as a global soy exporter, or could serve to choke-off domestic
livestock demand. Neither is in the interests of U.S. soybean
growers."
"Based on APHIS’ scientific review, soybean
meal and planting seed can be imported safely if handled under the
proper protocols," Ford continued. ASA urges APHIS to make ASA’s
recommendations part of any import protocols governing soybean meal and
soybean planting seed imports, so that the U.S. soy industry is
safeguarded from the accidental introduction of soybean rust. ASA’s
position on soybean imports, however, is that key scientific questions
must be answered before any soybean import protocol is issued by APHIS,
and before any potential commodity soybean imports from rust-affected
countries are contemplated."
--30--
For more information contact:
Dwain Ford, ASA Chairman, 618/547-3404, ussoy1@yahoo.com
Bob Callanan, ASA Communications Director, 314/576-1770, bcallanan@soy.org
Access this release at http://www.soygrowers.com |